
In each act, the definition of employer has been amended by its respective House Bill to exclude franchisors in cases where a franchise relationship exists and the franchisee is solely responsible for providing paid wages or fringe benefits to employees. The new bills are largely in response to a 2015 ruling by the National Labor Relations Board that stated that both the franchisor and the franchisee can be considered “joint employers” that share responsibility for the franchisee’s workers. (See our article on the NLRB’s Browning-Ferris decision here: https://detroitbusinesslaw.com/?s=browning
Although changing the definition of employer may seem like a small change, it has a large impact on franchisors in light of the NLRB’s Browning-Ferris decision. With these changes to the definition of employer, the franchisor is less likely to be determined to be a “joint-employer” and liable for acts of the franchisee.
This article was written by Tyler Kemper, law clerk.